Skip to main content

Ozone NAAQS

环境保护局(EPA)的数据显示,六种常见空气污染物的国家排放量平均下降了70%。这是我们人口,能源使用和GDP的增加。该国的空中正在休息更清洁,随着国家实施现有标准,尚未完全实施的国家将继续完善。许多市政当局需要更多的时间来实施当前的国家环境空气质量标准(NaaQ),但该机构继续毫不犹豫地急于将其降低到公共卫生的几乎没有或没有改善。

例如,对臭氧标准的不必要的修订可能会显着寒冷的经济投资和全国活动。各种规模的企业可以被迫导航额外的官僚和繁文缛节,以满足增加的允许要求。这甚至可能会阻止社区改善老化基础设施,如高速公路或废物处理设施。

Communities and businesses must be allowed to continue the progress they have made without the uncertainty and unnecessary cost for all Americans created by shifting standards to levels that achieve no demonstrable health benefit.

Related:The Facts on NAAQS(PDF) |博客帖子


新的臭氧规则可能是最昂贵的

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) should not change the current ozone standards. The U.S. government has a responsibility to keep federal regulations sensible and not change standards on businesses and consumers needlessly.

更多的 ”

API Recommends EPA retain current NAAQS for Ozone

The American Petroleum Institute (API) supports the option EPA included in the proposal to retain the current primary National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone at the level of 0.075 parts per million (ppm). Further, API supports EPA's proposal to retain the form of the secondary standard equal to the primary standard, in this instance at 0.075 ppm. API finds that the science does not support a change in these standards and that the current standards protect public health and welfare with an adequate margin of safety.

更多的 ”

关于拟议的臭氧NAAQ的公众意见

有关美国环境保护局(EPA)的公众意见和证词,提出了国家空气质量标准(NAAQ)的更新。

更多的 ”